Should compulsory military service be deemed a violation of rights?
Should compulsory military service be considered a violation of human rights? This is one issue on which there is very much disagreement. While many individuals and groups believe that serving in the military, even in a volunteer capacity, is a valuable thing for those who choose to serve, there are those who believe that it is a wrong idea. However, this article will discuss some of the different arguments that are thrown around and explore whether or not they have any merit.
The first question is; what constitutes “military service”? The answer is: keeping the country safe. Many people believe that the army is an entity that is occupying a country, rather than taking part in a nation’s political system. While this is an understandable point of view, it is not entirely correct. In fact, many historians would argue that one of the founding fathers of America, George Washington, actually served as a commissioned officer in the Continental army.
They argue that Washington was actually doing what he considered his duty, fighting against the British. While this is true, he was actually helping to organize an army that the British were about to lose. This was part of the American revolution, and Washington served as its commander. Some may argue that this makes him not a US citizen, which would be a point, but he was indeed participating in the revolution, which the constitution says all Americans are entitled to. This is something that critics of military service do not like to consider.
Another argument that is often made is that military service creates more individuals with psychological disorders. There are many who would say that this is a valid point. However, most mental health professionals would say that while this is something that can occur, the number of soldiers who turn into disorders is extremely low. In fact, statistics show that less than five percent of all people who serve in the military will go on to develop psychological disorders.
Critics also point out that it is unfair to ask all US citizens to serve. After all, the country was set up as a military protection shield for all its people. If everyone were required to go serve, then those living in peaceful neighborhoods would be affected. This is not only unfair but could be detrimental to national security.
The last thing that these people say is that it is not fair for the government to dictate how other people live their lives. Just because someone is afraid to take a risk in certain areas does not mean they are a bad person. Everyone has to make choices for themselves, and if they choose to live a sheltered existence, that is their choice. Should it be considered a crime to live in peace?
The short answer to the question should compulsory military service be considered a violation of rights? Yes. There are many problems with mandatory military service, and while serving may be an honorable endeavor, there are too many drawbacks to even consider it something worth doing. If you believe in the value of your rights, it would be in your best interest to avoid getting yourself into any situation where your safety and freedom are at stake.
One of the biggest problems with this type of service is that people simply do not want to put their lives on the line. There is simply too much risk involved, and too little reward. Worse, some people mistakenly believe that they need to serve their country in order to be worthwhile. In other words, they believe that if they are worthwhile, then they ought to be rewarded, and that means serving in any way they can.